SDCV v Director-General of Security: Procedural Fairness and the Ability to Decide a Matter Based on Secret Evidence Not Disclosed to a Party or their Legal Team
Article
Article Title | SDCV v Director-General of Security: Procedural Fairness and the Ability to Decide a Matter Based on Secret Evidence Not Disclosed to a Party or their Legal Team |
---|---|
ERA Journal ID | 33861 |
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Collins, Pauline and Gray, Anthony |
Journal Title | Australian Law Journal |
Journal Citation | 98 (1), pp. 57-68 |
Number of Pages | 12 |
Year | 2024 |
Publisher | Lawbook Co. |
Place of Publication | Australia |
ISSN | 0004-9611 |
Web Address (URL) | https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/agispt.20240109101681 |
Abstract | This paper considers a recent High Court decision where, by a slim majority, the Court validated a measure whereby a person affected by a decision may not have access to information taken into account regarding the decision made. The decision indicates that, in time, a tougher approach might be taken to the constitutionality of such measures. |
Keywords | procedural fairness natural justice SDCV secret evidence |
Contains Sensitive Content | Does not contain sensitive content |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 480702. Constitutional law |
Public Notes | Files associated with this item cannot be displayed due to copyright restrictions. |
Byline Affiliations | School of Law and Justice |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/z3vvv/sdcv-v-director-general-of-security-procedural-fairness-and-the-ability-to-decide-a-matter-based-on-secret-evidence-not-disclosed-to-a-party-or-their-legal-team
160
total views1
total downloads4
views this month0
downloads this month