A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic
Article
Article Title | A global experiment on motivating social distancing during the COVID-19 pandemic |
---|---|
Article Category | Article |
Authors | Psychological Science Accelerator Self-Determination Theory Coll, A (Author), Machin, Michael A. (Author), Machin, Tanya (Author), Martin, Neil I. (Author) and Brownlow, Charlotte (Author) |
Journal Title | University of Adelaide |
Journal Citation | 119 (22), pp. 1-11 |
Article Number | e2111091119 |
Number of Pages | 11 |
Year | 2022 |
Place of Publication | United States |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2111091119 |
Web Address (URL) | https://www.pnas.org/doi/abs/10.1073/pnas.2111091119 |
Abstract | Finding communication strategies that effectively motivate social distancing continues to be a global public health priority during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-country, preregistered experiment (n = 25,718 from 89 countries) tested hypotheses concerning generalizable positive and negative outcomes of social distancing messages that promoted personal agency and reflective choices (i.e., an autonomy-supportive message) or were restrictive and shaming (i.e., a controlling message) compared with no message at all. Results partially supported experimental hypotheses in that the controlling message increased controlled motivation (a poorly internalized form of motivation relying on shame, guilt, and fear of social consequences) relative to no message. On the other hand, the autonomy-supportive message lowered feelings of defiance compared with the controlling message, but the controlling message did not differ from receiving no message at all. Unexpectedly, messages did not influence autonomous motivation (a highly internalized form of motivation relying on one’s core values) or behavioral intentions. Results supported hypothesized associations between people’s existing autonomous and controlled motivations and self-reported behavioral intentions to engage in social distancing. Controlled motivation was associated with more defiance and less long-term behavioral intention to engage in social distancing, whereas autonomous motivation was associated with less defiance and more short- and long-term intentions to social distance. Overall, this work highlights the potential harm of using shaming and pressuring language in public health communication, with implications for the current and future global health challenges. |
Keywords | behavior change; motivation; health communication; COVID-19; self-determination theory |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 520403. Learning, motivation and emotion |
Byline Affiliations | Durham University, United Kingdom |
School of Psychology and Counselling | |
Faculty of Health, Engineering and Sciences | |
Graduate Research School | |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q762w/a-global-experiment-on-motivating-social-distancing-during-the-covid-19-pandemic
Download files
86
total views48
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month