Emergent learning and interactive media artworks: parameters of interaction for novice groups

Emergent learning and interactive media artworks: parameters of interaction for novice groups

Emergent learning describes learning that occurs when participants interact and distribute knowledge, where learning is self-directed, and where the learning destination of the participants is largely unpredictable (Williams et al., 2011). These notions of learning arise from the topologies of social networks and can be applied to the learning that occurs in educational institutions. However, the question remains whether institutional frameworks can accommodate the opposing notion of 'cooperative systems' (Shirky, 2005) – systems that facilitate the creation of user‐generated content – particularly as first‐year education cohorts are novice groups in the sense of not yet having developed university‐level knowledge.

This paper theorizes an emergent learning assessment item (Flickr photo‐narratives) within a first year media arts undergraduate education course. It challenges the conventional models of student lecturer interaction by facilitating student directed and open‐ended learning by outlining a methodology of teaching for emergence. The paper applies a matrix with four parameters (teacher directed content/student‐directed content; non‐interactive learning task/ interactive learning framework). This matrix is used as a conceptual space to investigate how a learning task might be constructed to afford the best opportunities for emergent learning. It explores the strategies that interactive artists utilize for participant engagement (particularly the relationship between the artist and the audience in the creation of interactive artworks) and suggests how these strategies might be applied to emergent generative outcomes with first‐year education students.

We build upon Williams et al.'s framework of emergent learning, where 'content will not be delivered to learners but co‐constructed with them' (De Freitas & Conole, as cited in Williams et al., 2011, p. 40), and the notion that in constructing emergent learning environments 'considerable effort is required to ensure an effective balance between openness and constraint' (Williams et al., 2011, p. 39). We assert that, for a learning event within a Web 2.0 environment to be considered emergent, not only does there need to be an effective balance between teacher‐directed content and student‐directed content for knowledge to be open, creative and distributed by learners (Williams et al., 2011), but there also need to be multiple opportunities for interaction and communication between students within the system and that these 'drive the emergence of structures that are more complex than the mere parts of that system' (Sommerer & Mignonneau, 2002, p. 161).