How to communicate evaluation work in design science research? An exemplar case study
Paper
Paper/Presentation Title | How to communicate evaluation work in design science research? An exemplar case study |
---|---|
Presentation Type | Paper |
Authors | Shrestha, Anup (Author), Cater-Steel, Aileen (Author) and Toleman, Mark (Author) |
Editors | Tan, Felix and Bunker, Deborah |
Journal or Proceedings Title | Proceedings of the 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2014) |
Number of Pages | 10 |
Year | 2014 |
Place of Publication | Auckland, New Zealand |
Web Address (URL) of Paper | https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/items/6987e29e-da23-44aa-b0d2-5f4adbc9880d |
Web Address (URL) of Conference Proceedings | https://openrepository.aut.ac.nz/collections/5b7854aa-901e-4c5c-a457-7928503cb23f |
Conference/Event | 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2014) |
Event Details | Rank A A A A A A A A A A A A A A |
Event Details | 25th Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS 2014) Parent Australasian Conference on Information Systems (ACIS) Delivery In person Event Date 08 to end of 10 Dec 2014 Event Location Auckland, New Zealand |
Abstract | How should we communicate evaluation work in design science research (DSR)? A case study based on our industry collaboration research project encountered this challenge after finding limited guidance on a structure to effectively communicate DSR evaluation work. We propose a logic model as a consistent reporting structure to communicate DSR evaluation by presenting a unified view of inputs, outputs, and immediate and long-term outcomes. The case study is based on an IT service organisation where a novel research artefact to conduct IT service process assessments was implemented. We present this case study as a real-life exemplar for an experimental design involving the use of a logic model to communicate DSR evaluation work. This case study provides a source of qualitative evaluation data to explore and subsequently analyse how the application of a simple logic model might provide the much needed structure to communicate critical evaluation activities in a DSR project. |
Keywords | design research; evaluation design |
ANZSRC Field of Research 2020 | 350204. Financial institutions (incl. banking) |
350208. Investment and risk management | |
460908. Information systems organisation and management | |
Public Notes | Shrestha, Cater-Steel & Toleman © 2014. The authors assign to ACIS and educational and non-profit institutions a non-exclusive licence to use this document for personal use and in courses of instruction provided that the article is used in full and this copyright statement is reproduced. The authors also grant a non-exclusive licence to ACIS to publish this document in full in the Conference Papers and Proceedings. Those documents may be published on the World Wide Web, CD-ROM, in printed form, and on mirror sites on the World Wide Web. Any other usage is prohibited without the express permission of the authors. |
Byline Affiliations | School of Management and Enterprise |
Institution of Origin | University of Southern Queensland |
https://research.usq.edu.au/item/q2ww0/how-to-communicate-evaluation-work-in-design-science-research-an-exemplar-case-study
Download files
1720
total views364
total downloads0
views this month0
downloads this month